Recent comments
GTranslate
Latest Stories
User login
Official MotoGP.com News Feed
MotoMatters.com Store
Get your exclusive MotoMatters t-shirts here!
Follow MotoMatters on Twitter
59 of #58 - Andrew Wheeler's Tribute In Pictures To Marco Simoncelli
Kropotkin's Corner
The most Important Race In The World
How To Save MotoGP, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
LCR Honda's Inspire Magazine
Help a MotoGP fan fight brain cancer
Recent comments
-
Desh1 hour 13 min ago
-
pooch3 hours 38 min ago
-
TheBaron4 hours 44 min ago
-
David Emmett5 hours 10 min ago
-
TheBaron5 hours 39 min ago
MotoGP News
- Andrea Dovizioso: «Bessere Traktion als Yamaha»
- Cal Crutchlow: Haarriss im Schienbein
- Nicky Hayden: «Es ist frustrierend»
- Jorge Lorenzo: «Es sieht besser aus als in Jerez»
- Le Mans: Schwerer Unfall auf der Startgeraden
- Marc Márquez: Nichts deutet auf Vertragsbruch hin
- Dani Pedrosa: Nur der Sieg zählt
- Valentino Rossi: «Habe Extra-Grip nicht genützt»
- Pirro über Ducati: «Evo-Maschine ist besser»
- Lucio Cecchinello: «Kampfgeist nicht verloren»





Viewership or revenue? They are not exactly the same goal, especialy in the short term. These days I suspect revenue is the first goal so whatever broadcast company puts up the best offer, even if they will service fewer viewers, will get the nod.
As far as the number of Spanish riders goes, so what? As CE says it is largely out of Dorna's hands. We want to have the best of the best out there and currently Spain and Italy put the most effort into training kids from a young age. There's been a lot more non-Spanish riders coming up through the RBRC in the past couple of years but I think that is more due to more riders of other nationalities applying than RBRC turning down Spaniards.
Chris
http://moto2-usa.blogspot.com/
It's the only GP close to me (still an 18 hour drive). But it would give me more reason to check out Leguna Seca or COTA. They should bring back Shanghai. Not that I like the track that much but if we're talking big Asian markets, well...
"Dorna and Infront are the same: without racing, they have nothing, and have to dismantle their companies and fire the hundreds of people who work for them."
Going to have to disagree with you on the Infront side David. They have football, hockey, basketball, downhill skiing and a bunch of other sports under license. Dorna is racing purely.
-jim
But I will anyway; if he wants to widen the appeal of the sport, why has he torpedoed future viewing in the UK by signing with BT and dumping the BBC and Eurosport?
When tickets sold to the UK round plummet in future years because no-one watches it anymore, will the UK get dumped?
I ask rhetorically of course!
I'm not his biggest fan right now.
It would be fairly easy to calculate the time taken for such bikes to stop from the typical dry corner entry speed and then to accelerate back to that speed. Deduct that from their overall time. If they obstruct/delay another rider on re-entry double the penalty. If they collide with/take-out another rider, disqualify them.
That way a rider doesn't have to think too much, still needs his brain 'in', knows a run-off is not a no-penalty option for a late over-optimistic overtake, and isn't required to actually stop or ride around 'soft' or other obstructions to slow him/her down.
Riders/ex-riders seems to be saying that the best solution to the first corner crash-fest is to ride straight through on the first lap. The above would permit an 'open' escape road to allow that and penalise anyone who runs straight-on during the remainder of the race (and remove the need to know which is the correct piece of tarmac to ride through on!).
These chicanes get a lot of criticism - but they did provide for a brilliant piece of riding from Lowes in the WSS race (eventually).
I think Guintoli has the edge on the claim to the podium here.
I somehow doubt that Sykes or Guintoli are the sort of characters to hate each other after this - both are nice guys. However, as Sykes well knows, every point counts and their teams will be pursuing every opportunity they can.
Monza produces good racing, tension, and excitement. If its popular with the fans and teams, why push against that?
If Dorna drops it, it will be a sad day.
I completely agree jbond - I don't have BT anything and I don't watch any other sport than motorcycling on a regular basis so there is no way I would buy a "sports" package from BT, Sky or anyone. My first thought was oh well, back to the MotoGP.com subscription (which I used to have when it was not so highly priced). Than I realised that Dorna are on a win/win. More money from BT Sport and an increase in website subscriptions. Once again (as with far too many things) it's all down to the money. I like the uninterrupted coverage on the BBC - best make the most of the rest of the season I guess. Not sure where/if I'll be able to watch next year. What happened to wanting to raise the profile of MotoGP and increase viewers/fans? Shame on you Dorna.
Here in NASCAR-land, the AMA series has visited a fair number of "roval" circuits. Policing course cuts has always been a total friggin' headache, with no one happy with any outcome, so it's probably a relief that the only one the AMA still visits is Daytona.
That is where this story takes place.
A good friend of mine is a former AMA 250 GP racer; excellent wrench, very good rider, self-financed privateer machine vs the factory stuff. He was usually a top-10 guy, and one of the highlights of his life was getting on a 250 GP podium.
One year, he is at Daytona. At that circuit, the point where you leave the oval and cut into the infield is not far from the point where the infield circuit re-joins the oval. During practice, he barrels into Turn One, realizes he's not going to make it, and stands it up. He doesn't bother turning around and taking the infield; it's just practice. He just cruises across to the point where the infield circuit re-joins the oval and gets back on the gas.
The automated timing system does not realize that he's cut the course. And the combination of a slower rider cutting that whole pesky infield thing out of his lap added up to a lap time that was almost exactly what the factory guys were turning!
Because the lap time was close to what other people - the factory riders - were doing, the manual scorers couldn't just eliminate it out of hand. So the lap time stood for a few moments. Once my friend saw what had happened, he went and straightened the situation out.
But for a brief shining moment, the official timing and scoring pylon at Day-freaking-tona had his bike number right at the top, next to Rich-friggin-Oliver.
He still giggles every time he tells that story. I smile every time I hear it.
I think you've got it wrong thinking that Marquez was using Lorenzo as a berm. I'm sure he would have made the corner if Lorenzo ran off the track. They only contacted when Lorenzo decided to complete the turn.
Marquez tried a last lap, last corner block pass - nothing wrong with that.
Lorenzo decided to complete the turn, as he would naturally have to otherwise run off track - nothing wrong with that.
If I had to make a guess I'd say that you're one of the fans affected by the recent "gentleman racing" syndrome, just wanting riders to form a line and ride nicely... (don't feel bad, I had definitely started to slip into that mindset as well... and who could blame us after the last few years of, let's be honest, boring MotoGP racing).
Hard racing or racing... there is no difference. It's all just racing!
Like a lot of people I was pretty shocked to see Marquez pull that last corner move on Lorenzo. My immediate thought was something like "Oh no, Marquez has decided to bring his Moto2 antics with him..."
But reading this article it started to dawn on me, just as Lorenzo et al may have become used to "gentelmen" style of racing, I think the same is true of viewers as well!! If I think back, there is a time when I would have been getting so excited for this kind of racing action, but now it seems a bit shocking, almost where I was wondering what's going on - wanting them to just get back in line and race nicely!
Thinking about it now, this is actually a very welcome change to the MotoGP we've been watching over the last years. Now I would actually say that I hope all the other racers raise their game to Marquez level!
Also interesting equation that Mat put together:
Stoner’s talent + Marco Simoncelli’s aggression = Marc Márquez
Perhaps Marquez will turn out to be the best thing for MotoGP since Rossi...?
I have to admit that I was not a fan of Marquez, mostly because of his many questionable moves in Moto2. But there's nothing wrong with hard racing, as long as his moves don't become questionable, I think I'm becoming a Marquez fan.
I wouldn't call the move that Marquez made unintentional... something like that seems to me like a fairly high level of commitment and a firm decision to follow through with it!
Anyway, like you I was a bit surprised to read that the solution would be for Lorenzo to hang back a bit. Now I'm no racer, but I agree with what you say - Lorenzo was already in the corner, you can't just hit the brakes and slow up a bit. Lorenzo already ran wide trying to avoid Marquez and probably decided he was out far enough and had to try to turn eventually otherwise be pushed right off the track.
Of course it's easy to say that Lorenzo could have won if he just hung back a bit and kept clear of Marquez, but to say that is to make a redundant statement. If Lorenzo had not assumed that Marques would not have a go, then the conversation now would probably be much different anyway.
I think Lorenzo was caught between a rock and a hard place. Defending his position might have prevented Marquez from attempting the pass where he did, but would almost certainly have resulted in an overtake in the drag to the line. Lorenzo is giving away 6Kg, probably 10 bhp and a seamless shift gearbox and his only chance was to take maximum momentum onto the straight. That involves a wide sweeping line (leaving the door open) which was bound to end in contact if the person behind is a bit of a loose canon....
is the route IMO.
It would be fairly easy to calculate the time taken for such bikes to stop from the typical dry corner entry speed and then to accelerate back to that speed. Deduct that from their overall time. If they obstruct/delay another rider on re-entry double the penalty. If they collide with/take-out another rider, disqualify them.
That way a rider doesn't have to think too much, still needs his brain 'in', knows a run-off is not a no-penalty option for a late over-optimistic overtake, and isn't required to actually stop or ride around 'soft' or other obstructions to slow him/her down.
Riders/ex-riders seems to be saying that the best solution to the first corner crash-fest is to ride straight through on the first lap. The above would permit an 'open' escape road to allow that and penalise anyone who runs straight-on during the remainder of the race (and remove the need to know which is the correct piece of tarmac to ride through on!).
These chicanes get a lot of criticism - but they did provide for a brilliant piece of riding from Lowes in the WSS race (eventually).
Shame about the end of race 2. I can see how the officials might have felt they had to abide by the letter of the rules but I wish they could have found a way to give Guintoli the place he really deserved. I'm a big fan of both riders so I'd feel bad whichever way it worked out. Perhaps I'll just look on this as karma after the way Sykes was short-changed last year at Monza...
Great ride by Laverty in race 2. But it would be nice if he showed a little emotion afterwards! The Mr. Spock of superbike racing behaves the same when he wins as when he crashes out. C'mon Eugene, live a little! ;-)
Chaz Davies crashed trying to make up ground on the leaders after starting 9th on the grid. If (when) he gets the hang of qualifying he'll win the championship.
I look forward to your article David.
"The TV coverage itself will be a vast improvement on the BBC show."
That won't be hard, but they will have to go a long way to top the Eurosport coverage.
"If you get BT Sport, no doubt your experience will be better. If you don't (or you can't), it will clearly be worse."
This is the main thrust of the majority of fans opposition to this move. There is only one choice - pay to watch or don't pay and don't watch.
The cost of subscription to either the BT Sport channel on SKY or doing a broadband switch to the BT service (issues of speed and quality aside) just to see MotoGP cannot be justified as good value, or even competitive in the TV subscription channel market.
I would be in favour of watching delayed coverage on Eurosport as we currently do, or even days later if it came to it. I just can't justify the extra cost of subscription to BT sport on top of what I already pay for my SKY package.
If Hector losses his ride with Avintia Blusens, would he grab the team boss by the throat?
I would prefer the rule be that if you run off the racing circuit you can only re-enter after having given ground to the next rider following you. I can't stand the fact that blokes run off and resume often without looking, or without suffering a penalty for their error. So I'm with you and Stoner on the general philosopy.
And what about that chicane - make a mistake there and lose plenty of ground (and maybe a penalty for not staying within the lines), yet elsewhere there is no real disincentive for outbraking yourself and running off?? Makes no sense to me.
Had this been any other racetrack Sykes would have been on his head in a gravel runoff trap and DNF'd. And it wasn't even the first time he'd blown that exact chicane - he screwed it up in the first race in the same spot. At any other track, it's two DNFs for Sykes, not a pair of thirds.
I seem to recall Stoner complaining that paved runoff areas were a bad idea precisely for this reason - that riders would make dumb and dangerous moves since the potential consequence was so small - a penalty, maybe.
I love the races at Monza, but they have to be officiated differently than other tracks that are self-policing (i.e., you run off, you crash or lose a lot of time). And so far, that level of competence by officials has not been seen.
I hope that they appeal the overturned descision.....and win.
Guintoli was brazenly robbed.
It is sad that two riders who were probably quite friendly may now become enemies because of what appears to be a lack of clear guidelines as to what is, and what is not, acceptable in the case of the chicanes at Monza. After Sykes took evasive action to avoid ramming Melandri and went off-track on the tarmac inside the chicane, he regained the track, took a quick look to see that Guintoli was still behind him, then got his head down to charge after Melandri and Laverty. Guintoli in contrast, appeared to slow down and cruise to the finish.
If we look at their last four laps, this is the picture:
Sykes 1m 43.151s Guintoli 1m 43.118s
1m 43.162ss 1m 42.937s
1m 42.703s 1m 43.149s
1m 42.596s 1m 43.788s
This shows that Sylvain's last lap was more than a second slower than Tom's. Had he maintained his pace, he may very well have re-passed Tom before the chequered flag. The rule is that you don't back off until the chequered flag is displayed, (and as young Marquez forgot two years ago, once the chequers are waved, you definitely cease racing).
..the only way Barberá can make headlines since he is MotoGP rider is with an embarrassing case of domestic violence. I cant´remember any other time when a Barberá headline had 10+ comments.
I had no much respect for Barberá before this incident; I have no respect at all for someone who mistreats women like him. He´s a sorry excuse for a man.
If domestic violence is a problem in Spain. I ask why the hell they sentenced his girlfriend as well. She broke up with him, he couldn´t handle it and he assaulted her. He grabbed her by the throat, what was she supposed to do? nothing?
Mutual assault? yeah right!
The team must sack him. No question.
Really meant to overtake Guinters then run wide onto the dirt & gravel on purpose and run the risk of throwing everything away! Don't talk wet!
Technically he did gain the position prior to running off track and joined back on track in the same position. Read the rules, its the same as Marquez last week, by technical rules he had a wheel in front of Lorenzo so was deemed as being in front which is the same as Tom but he had the whole bike in front of Sylvain.
Race direction would of analyzed the gap between Tom and Melandri to see if he made any gains and it is now obvious that he didn't, hence the result being overturned yet again.
So here it is, while i rate Sylvain as a good man and awesome racer, he got beat on the day.
He still leads the championship so best to just kick some arse next time out, if he can catch Tom that is...
I have watched these boys racing from very early years and find them both to be awesome lads to watch plying their trade in their respective championships. Hopefully, one day they will be back together racing in the same championship causing confusing havoc once again.
Both lads have stepped up to the plate and are proving to be a very mature force to be reckoned with.
Also hopefully next time we bump into them in our local Asda here in Derby, my Mrs wont just stand there and say 'There's Sam and Alex Lowes' lol
Good Luck to both brothers and we hope you both end up with the number 1 plates on your bikes for next year....
Great track! I love it.
As soon as Sykes came back on track in 3rd I was thinking he should've slotted into 4th because the rule is you are not allowed to gain an advantage from an off-track excursion, and IMO keeping 3rd place was an advantage.
The fact that Sykes almost clipped Melandri means nothing, and I'm not sure what race direction was thinking. It's not like #33 was brake checking #66 to cause the issue.
Regardless - 2 flag to flag races with 4 guys battling for the lead will lead me to feel very disappointed during next week's MotoGP Parade.
You're absolutely correct. That's a result of transcribing my own daft shorthand into longhand before the next race started. Of course it was Marino, and luckily I got it right at the top and tail of the article. Thanks for spotting that one. :)