Kropotkin wrote:If we only allow potential world champions to enter MotoGP, then over the next 6 years, I see only Marc Marquez, Alex Rins and maybe Maverick Vinales being added to the grid. While we lose maybe 6-8 other riders.
Marquez is the only rider I can see at the moment with the potential to beat Lorenzo, Stoner and Pedrosa in the future. The rest do not stand a chance. It's early for Vinales, but he shows promise, and reports from Spain about Rins are very promising.
Realistically, though, there are only ever going to be a few riders capable of winning a title. If we only allow potential champions, the grid would be down to 3 or 4 riders in most years.
Tormo4ever wrote:Rins is dicing it up in the national 125cc here with Alex ...Márquez. The kid you see in Marc´s pit on tv.
You guys think Márquez should move up to mgp in 2012, moto2 champion or not? I think definitely.
Kropotkin wrote:JoeKing wrote:There is no conflict between my statements. Future MotoGP candidates should be chosen on their potential to become world champions..not grid fillers, or do you believe he IS a potential WC :.
If we only allow potential world champions to enter MotoGP, then over the next 6 years, I see only Marc Marquez, Alex Rins and maybe Maverick Vinales being added to the grid. While we lose maybe 6-8 other riders.
Marquez is the only rider I can see at the moment with the potential to beat Lorenzo, Stoner and Pedrosa in the future. The rest do not stand a chance. It's early for Vinales, but he shows promise, and reports from Spain about Rins are very promising.
Realistically, though, there are only ever going to be a few riders capable of winning a title. If we only allow potential champions, the grid would be down to 3 or 4 riders in most years.
JoeKing wrote:Krop
I had previously stated a broader definition as to who I thought deserved a seat in MotoGP. To look first at WSBK & Moto2 champions & most importantly to those showing an upward trajectory in their results. If the criteria simply becomes a financial standard what will follow is a race to the bottom in quality...I'd rather it be the opposite.
Even considering their struggles, I'd still say at the end of '10 Elias & Aoyama were better prospects than Abraham.
Kropotkin wrote:JoeKing wrote:Krop
I had previously stated a broader definition as to who I thought deserved a seat in MotoGP. To look first at WSBK & Moto2 champions & most importantly to those showing an upward trajectory in their results. If the criteria simply becomes a financial standard what will follow is a race to the bottom in quality...I'd rather it be the opposite.
Even considering their struggles, I'd still say at the end of '10 Elias & Aoyama were better prospects than Abraham.
Tormo4ever wrote:Joe, bottomline is that if he wasn t there , no one would be on that duke. it s the oldest duke out there and i dont think anyone elsepresented the money to race it this year, so would you rather not have him on the grid? He s doing ok. Either says he s worth more than we thought or that the second tier of the grid in moto gp aren t that fast.
JoeKing wrote:If your read any of my previous posts my problem is not personal with Abraham, or his results in MotoGP; it is with whether or not, absent his father's influence he would have even been CONSIDERED a worthy candidate.
JoeKing wrote:Tough choice...hun?
RedJet wrote:JoeKing wrote:If your read any of my previous posts my problem is not personal with Abraham, or his results in MotoGP; it is with whether or not, absent his father's influence he would have even been CONSIDERED a worthy candidate.
I think out of all your posts on the subject this is the most clear and sensible - probably because I felt the same when it was announced he would join (and everything is after, in the end, about me). However, I think we can use this (and I say this after reading everyone's response to your argument - of which I agree with completely) that this is a...oh God, I hate this term but I'm going to say it...ugh...a "teaching moment". That perhaps we shouldn't qualify only those who fit into an absolute specific criteria. A square into a round hole just might reveal a diamond in the rough. AKA; KA. Who has, I really think, proven himself quite admirably.JoeKing wrote:Tough choice...hun?
I assume you meant "tough choice...huh? Cuz otherwise that's weird.
That perhaps we shouldn't qualify only those who fit into an absolute specific criteria. A square into a round hole just might reveal a diamond in the rough. AKA; KA.
It's not really fair to judge Abraham on his years in 250 and moto2. There are plenty of riders in Motogp that didn't perform that great in the lower classes. How many podiums for Espargaró in 125 &250? How about Niccolò Canepa?
JoeKing wrote:It's not really fair to judge Abraham on his years in 250 and moto2. There are plenty of riders in Motogp that didn't perform that great in the lower classes. How many podiums for Espargaró in 125 &250? How about Niccolò Canepa?
Yep...got me there....didn't you just prove my point
ieism wrote:JoeKing wrote:It's not really fair to judge Abraham on his years in 250 and moto2. There are plenty of riders in Motogp that didn't perform that great in the lower classes. How many podiums for Espargaró in 125 &250? How about Niccolò Canepa?
Yep...got me there....didn't you just prove my point
I see what you mean, just saying Abraham is no better or worse than any other candidate. But what are the options?
What if Capirex is out next season and Randy decides he doesn't like the Duc that much afterall? Who would you like to see on the Pramac's next season? I don't reallly see a lot of guys in moto2 that will outperform Abraham, maybe Bradl and Marques but they hopefully won't settle for a satelite Duc. WSB is even worse, none of the younger guys are even close to the ex-motogp riders right now.
ieism wrote: I don't reallly see a lot of guys in moto2 that will outperform Abraham, maybe Bradl and Marques but they hopefully won't settle for a satelite Duc. WSB is even worse, none of the younger guys are even close to the ex-motogp riders right now.
Albert wrote:ieism wrote: I don't reallly see a lot of guys in moto2 that will outperform Abraham, maybe Bradl and Marques but they hopefully won't settle for a satelite Duc. WSB is even worse, none of the younger guys are even close to the ex-motogp riders right now.
Current rumours are linking Bradl to Tech 3 next season!
Yamaha are hopeful that Edwards will retire (gracefully I hope) and the Tech 3 team will then be Crutchlow and Bradl.
WSB -- yep - I agree with you! Their dominance appears to be due to their years in MotoGP and their ability to get the bike set up better better than the rest. They all have experience of complex electronics so maybe that's where they excel!
Kropotkin wrote:
Edwards may stay on for another year at Yamaha's request to help develop the 1000. Signs are Yamaha are very interested in doing this.
Albert wrote:Kropotkin wrote:
Edwards may stay on for another year at Yamaha's request to help develop the 1000. Signs are Yamaha are very interested in doing this.
That makes far more sense to me than to have (what could almost be considered as) two rookies in the same team!
Despite the fact that he's never had a MotoGP win (and Nicky gets flack for 3???) Colin is well renowned for the accuracy of his feedback when it comes to development, be it machinery or tyres!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest