Gar wrote:Does Honda want to win the title?
Kropotkin wrote:Surely not!
(Yes).
ducati1098s wrote:shoulder ... Dr Costa misdiagnosis ... leg
Nachlauf wrote:But Rossi would be a big gamble. Lorenzo has already shown that he is better than Rossi. So how is Rossi supposed to beat Lorenzo?
CLX wrote:Luthi, Espargaro and Ianonne.
What will they be up to in 2013?
Nachlauf wrote:I'd think so. With Dani they have a good shot if he doesn't get injured.
But Rossi would be a big gamble. Lorenzo has already shown that he is better than Rossi.
JanBros wrote:Rossi on a factory Honda isn't going to happen, it would give Honda less chances for the title, not more.
JanBros wrote:Rossi on a factory Honda isn't going to happen, it would give Honda less chances for the title, not more.
why ? I believe everybody will agree :to become WC in 2013, you will need to beat Lorenzo. Lorenzo won't have real competition within Yamaha, so HRC needs to beat just 1 guy.
Now IF Rossi would be as fast as Dani on the Honda (note the "big if",as I believe that is far from certain ) they would take points away from each other (only if both would be better than Jorge for most of the races, they could batle it out amongst them - again, something I don't believe will happen).
So IMHO Honda's best chance for the title in 2013, is to have a "slightly lesser than Pedrosa" team mate and just let Dani battle it out with Jorge. Maybe Dani is not evenly matched, but they'd be sure of every second place there is if Dani doesn't beat Jorge and hope for maybe 1/a couple more DNF's for Jorge. It certainly will be better than having to share 2nd and 3rd places between 2 riders.
dave_m wrote:This strategy doesn't exactly match with recent history though, as Honda signed Stoner to ride with Pedrosa and Yamaha signed Lorenzo to ride along Rossi. Even Ducati signed Melandri and Hayden to ride beside Stoner, and while it's obvious now that they weren't going to take point of Stoner, it was much less clear at the time. If Honda truly had this strategy, why would they have given factory support to Simoncelli for 2012, when he could take points off Stoner?
tom wrote:To true Dave, it always bugged me the 'two strong team mates takes points off each other' argument. On average they take just as much points off the other riders as they do themselves + you get the added advantage of them pushing each other on to new heights.
And another thing that bugs me a little (I'm getting cranky in my old age), it the criticism Tech3 got for not providing their riders with the upgraded brakes. Seems to me that on average they have a fair gap forward to the factory teams and a fair gap behind to the other satellite teams so the extra 0.1 second a lap the upgraded brakes provide would be money waisted. Smart decision in my books.
lennyzrx wrote:somehow I see Ben on a year off and headin back to Suzuki's new effort. Ben I'm sure is still tight with Yosh and Suzuki.
Cam D wrote:If it consistently makes .1 of a difference then it's worth every penny. Add to that the confidence it gives your rider when challenging for a pass, or even just knowing that you havee the latest gera. If it makes bugger all difference why did Cal bitch and moan to anyone with a pen and paper that he didn't have the new brakes? Psychology is such a bit part of a riders kit and any little boost can have a measurable gain in their performance.
Hanuman wrote:Putting your eggs in one basket doesn't seem the wisest choice, plus it provides a succession plan and it seems wiser to have as many strong riders on your own team than let them be on a rival's.
dave_m wrote:This strategy doesn't exactly match with recent history though, as Honda signed Stoner to ride with Pedrosa and Yamaha signed Lorenzo to ride along Rossi. Even Ducati signed Melandri and Hayden to ride beside Stoner, and while it's obvious now that they weren't going to take points off Stoner, it was much less clear at the time. If Honda truly had this strategy, why would they have given factory support to Simoncelli for 2012, when he could take points off Stoner?
Nachlauf wrote:ducati1098s wrote:shoulder ... Dr Costa misdiagnosis ... leg
Excuses...
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests