Nachlauf wrote: Next time he puts it all together I'm sure.
CLX wrote:One was a normal overtaking manuvre, the other involved commiting a mistake and correcting it/returning to racing line without any regard for possible nearby competitors.
They are quite different to me.
Zaphod wrote:That's how I see it as well, although if I wanted to stick my own opinion on it, Pedrosa had his back wheel off the ground, counter steering and the bike nearly upright, trying for a an ever diminishing gap on a line that at best meant Sic was going to end up in the dirt.
The key for me there, is some are now taking the line that Pol was going for a gap that wasn't there...........
I'd like to know why in one incident the rider on the inside was right in one instance, and in the other is the fool ?
coyote wrote:
You mean one was a reckless overtaking move cutting in to the space of the overtakee without any regard and one was a normal (succesful if Espargaro acts properly) defense of position after a mistake?
Even still I think Simo's penalty was nip and tuck.
coyote wrote:Adding to the point that we've already seen Espargaro all over teh place in the last 2 laps of Estoril, making many "doomed" moves which forces Marquez to avoid him. I take it he was doing no wrong then and it was just great racing? Now that Marquez shuts the door and Espargaro decides to ride through him it's Marquez fault?
Rossifumi wrote:coyote wrote:
You mean one was a reckless overtaking move cutting in to the space of the overtakee without any regard and one was a normal (succesful if Espargaro acts properly) defense of position after a mistake?
Even still I think Simo's penalty was nip and tuck.
or you really think that if someone has run wide and lost speed that the normal thing to do is immediately cut to the racing line into someone coming through on the normal racing line at racing speed leaving the rider coming through nowhere to go? There would be a lot more accidents if this was the normal response to running wide. Espargaro was on the normal racing line and was alongside Marquez - how do you expect him to act in order to 'act properly'? what do you expect him to do - get off the track completely? I don't think it was malicious on Marqeuz' part but it was careless, dangerous and avoidable.
coyote wrote:
The normal thing to do after running wide is definitely regroup in the fastest manner possible, usually by squirting it into the racing line. If I had to estimate, I've seen probably 300-500 different occasions where the leader going wide and does this forcing the follower to stand up instead of getting their fronts taken away. It has happened in that corner alone too many times to count. Of course it's different if the leader sees another rider in the space he's about to take, this would also usually mean the follower has gotten ahead and "owns" the space now.
What Espargaro needed to do? Roll off the throttle as soon as he saw he wasn't going to make it ahead. For these guys it's not exactly heroics.
rick wrote:coyote wrote:Adding to the point that we've already seen Espargaro all over teh place in the last 2 laps of Estoril, making many "doomed" moves which forces Marquez to avoid him. I take it he was doing no wrong then and it was just great racing? Now that Marquez shuts the door and Espargaro decides to ride through him it's Marquez fault?
If you leave a gap expect someone to fill it.
Marquez' corner exit speed sucked after that save and he was well wide, Espargo filled the gap rapidly and was on the normal racing line, remember, Marc had gone well off line with that save. Did Marc get caught out by the speed at which Pol appeared at that point of the track ? Possibly, although it's possible in that instant Marquez just tried a bit of bluff too and didn't stand the bike up, hoping Pol would roll out of the throttle.
Rossifumi wrote:coyote wrote:
The normal thing to do after running wide is definitely regroup in the fastest manner possible, usually by squirting it into the racing line. If I had to estimate, I've seen probably 300-500 different occasions where the leader going wide and does this forcing the follower to stand up instead of getting their fronts taken away. It has happened in that corner alone too many times to count. Of course it's different if the leader sees another rider in the space he's about to take, this would also usually mean the follower has gotten ahead and "owns" the space now.
What Espargaro needed to do? Roll off the throttle as soon as he saw he wasn't going to make it ahead. For these guys it's not exactly heroics.
Espargaro is sufficiently alongside that Marquez should leave at least a bike width and not move right to the kerb; just like the Luthi incident at Qatar.
coyote wrote:But he say he didn't see Espargaro there and I believe him ....
Japhrodisiac wrote:Ben will have sufficient levels of Red Mist now to push him forward for the next part of the season. I really think he was in for a podium today, and it would be interesting to see the lap times comparo between he and the leaders after he returned to the track, finishing in 11th, only 2.8 sec back from Nicky. A nice Barbera-esque pass on Barbera too.
Cam D wrote:Japhrodisiac wrote:Ben will have sufficient levels of Red Mist now to push him forward for the next part of the season. I really think he was in for a podium today, and it would be interesting to see the lap times comparo between he and the leaders after he returned to the track, finishing in 11th, only 2.8 sec back from Nicky. A nice Barbera-esque pass on Barbera too.
10th - he was doing high 43's and then low 44's. Pretty much the same as the guys at the front (Jorge was all 43's from lap 8). Ben was quite a bit faster than Rossi, Bautista, Bradl and Hayden. He was 1 - 1.5sec a lap quicker than Hayden. Stoners laps from 1/2 race were all between 43.7 to 44.3 so he was pretty consistent.
Squidpuppet wrote:Cam, look at those lap times again. He was FAR off the leaders pace. Sadly.
coyote wrote:CLX wrote:One was a normal overtaking manuvre, the other involved commiting a mistake and correcting it/returning to racing line without any regard for possible nearby competitors.
They are quite different to me.
You mean one was a reckless overtaking move cutting in to the space of the overtakee without any regard and one was a normal (succesful if Espargaro acts properly) defense of position after a mistake?
Even still I think Simo's penalty was nip and tuck.
Nachlauf wrote:Squidpuppet wrote:Cam, look at those lap times again. He was FAR off the leaders pace. Sadly.
What? How is that "far off the pace"? He was basically doing 43s like the leaders after his tires were clean again and he had shaken off the dust. Of course he had a few 44s in there, because he was rolling up to the backmarkers, who were driving their own races. With a clean race I'm sure he could have made 43s all race. And if you check his FP results on softs (FP3 and maybe FP2 although I'm not so sure about that) he put up these times in long stints continuously even in hotter conditions.
If you need slam him do it for his tumble. But his pace was fine imho.
coyote wrote:[
You mean one was a reckless overtaking move cutting in to the space of the overtakee without any regard and one was a normal (succesful if Espargaro acts properly) defense of position after a mistake?
Even still I think Simo's penalty was nip and tuck.
Gustav O wrote:Dropping a few tenths per lap is much easier if staying with the leading group than coming from behind and having to race on your own while over taking slower bikes, riders etc.
Maybe it wouldn´t have ended with him on the box but I think he would have been better than 7th had he not gone off the track.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Tumi and 4 guests