Tourn46 wrote:You know what... I can't be bothered
Squidpuppet wrote:Tourn46 wrote:You know what... I can't be bothered
Like Vale...
ducati1098s wrote:Its not about whether Ducati have acted in good or bad faith but whether they have listened. Rossi banged on time and time again last year about the bikes understeer and yet nothing really changed. I think he has been bloody patient myself and Im glad he's stopped now trying to be diplomatic. Ducati have to decide now whether they are prepared to make the necessary hard choices re their precious but flawed engineering principles. If not the bring on the divorce I say as something fundamental has to change re this ridiculous status quo of a bike 30 secs slower than the leaders. Rossi is forcing a confrontation and a choice to be made. Good
Tourn46 wrote:You know what... I can't be bothered
JanBros wrote:about Ducati : all those of you who shoot them for not giving what Rossi want's :
- Rossi got everything he asked for : in 2011 he always said the engine wasn't the problem, so they changed everything else.
- instead of shouting the bike is bad, he should try to understand the bike 100% and then ask for changes, not after 50%. He should have learned that by now. He should keep his mouth shut and just work, like anybody else has to.
- last year, we all said they didn't have alu perimeter experience and it is showing now. But for gods sake : it's only the first race ...
- anybody ever tried creating a bike ? I have, allthough at a totaly different level. but it is a challenge : lot's and lot's off sacrifices have to be made to some parts in order to get other parts working decently. Getting the balance right isn't something you decide from behind a desk, it is more a "trial and error" process. the result isn't always what you had in mind, but you are happy if it workes. Especialy if it is the first time (I don't take the GP zero into account, as it was just a GP11.1 with different frame to gather data, not a "real effort") you do something like that. So Ducati for the first time ever did this, and to me it appears to be a good result : it still is an incredibily fast bike that "lot's of" people can ride instead of just one. there only problem is that others have done this 10-50-100's of times and are better at it. But just give them some time, I'm sure they will learn quick and improve over the season.
eddahenry wrote:Im with Casey Stoner on the duck issue
Maybe just Maybe if they took what they had last year and worked on it and learnt it instead of throwing anything good that may have been there out with the bike they would be somewhere.
There is no Development going on here.
This bike sux i want X Y Z
here vale here is X Y Z
Nah Still sux i want G P W
OK Vale here is G P W
nahh still sux i want A M E
they spend no time felling it out Maybe X Y and G would have been the combination they where after
this is not development its chasing a miracle cure they could try moving the team into the Vatican and hope for some divine intervention
Squidpuppet wrote:ducati1098s wrote: Ducati have to decide now whether they are prepared to make the necessary hard choices re their precious but flawed engineering principles.
They have already made those decisions. Ducati have already recreated the bike many times AND have followed the recipe requests from JB and Rossi.
Underbraced swingarm: Done
M1 style pinch bolts for fork bottoms: Done
Aluminum twin spar: Done
JB says 90 degrees doesnt matter: Done
Engine rotated: Done
Adjustability range expanded: Done
With the numerous and significant changes, its hard to believe they arent listening to JB/Rossi.
Tourn46 wrote:You know what... I can't be bothered
redmike34 wrote: Might as well get on with it.
Hansd wrote:redmike34 wrote: Might as well get on with it.
Get on with what? I'm convinced that Vale has completely lost confidence that Ducati engineers can deliver what he needs. They've worked hard, given him many changes especially over the winter. By now, more than1 year into the project, they must have traveled all available avenues in terms of design and setup (with the possible exception of engine V-angle).
That's what really destroys one's confidence: to get all the changes you want, to set it up in all ways you know and some more....only to find out you're slower. Now what? I believe Rossi is completely at a loss, to a point where it starts affecting his driving style and raw speed.
I don't believe for a minute that Ducati has lost the ability to build a winning bike, nor that Rossi has lost his touch. But they are at a point right now where they've tried every possible option and more, and have no clue what to try next.
Oscar wrote:Just to break into the Ducati woes fixation for a moment - check out what Spies was putting up with at around 22 secs into: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cVfHqIo8TU
Talk about a jack-hammer enema...
redmike34 wrote:There's no shame in putting an honest effort into something and coming up short--that's what 99% of human beings spend the entirety of their lives doing.
chc-pr wrote:I a related note, I wish people would stop assuming that what is good for Rossi/what Rossi supporters want is also good/wanted by everyone interested in MotoGP. It is just more of the same arrogance and it is really annoying. It just makes me want him to fail all the more so those people have their noses rubbed in it. It is not about Rossi per se, but the arrogance of putting one man above the sport. It really pisses me off.
Hansd wrote:Racing is about winning and an honest effort will not do. Especially if you are a multiple champion. In this sense it is NOT like regular work.
Champs like Stoner and Rossi need a chance to win to be motivated. Take that away and you take away their purpose in life.
THAT's what you see in Rossi's body language!
I think the question is, at this point, not so much about whether or not Ducati's listening. You have to wonder if they actually have the requisite talent on staff to be able to close the gap in the first place. It may very well be that the engineering teams at Honda and Yamaha are just that much better than those at Ducati. Or that their budgets are unassailably better...
Oscar wrote:Just to break into the Ducati woes fixation for a moment - check out what Spies was putting up with at around 22 secs into: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cVfHqIo8TU
Talk about a jack-hammer enema...
redmike34 wrote:[Get on with taking what Ducati's giving him and doing the best he can with it. What do you want him to do, quit? Eff that. The way Rossi comes out of this the least-scathed is to go to work at every opportunity and try his hardest to make the bike work. If he and Ducati fail, they fail--too bad. There's no shame in putting an honest effort into something and coming up short--that's what 99% of human beings spend the entirety of their lives doing. There's a pretty significant amount of shame in a 33 year-old man throwing the toys out of the pram when he's in a situation that he willingly put himself in, knowing that this could happen.
Rossi's legacy won't be tarnished by failing with Ducati, or at least not much, if he puts an honest effort into it. If he doesn't put that effort in, or quits, I think it will be. Significantly. Just my opinion...

Oscar wrote:Just to break into the Ducati woes fixation for a moment - check out what Spies was putting up with at around 22 secs into: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cVfHqIo8TU
Talk about a jack-hammer enema...
Oscar wrote:Just to break into the Ducati woes fixation for a moment - check out what Spies was putting up with at around 22 secs into: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cVfHqIo8TU
Talk about a jack-hammer enema...
chc-pr wrote:On a related note, I wish people would stop assuming that what is good for Rossi/what Rossi supporters want is also good/wanted by everyone interested in MotoGP. It is just more of the same arrogance and it is really annoying. It just makes me want him to fail all the more so those people have their noses rubbed in it. It is not about Rossi per se, but the arrogance of putting one man above the sport. It really pisses me off.
Faster1 wrote:Oscar wrote:Just to break into the Ducati woes fixation for a moment - check out what Spies was putting up with at around 22 secs into: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cVfHqIo8TU
Talk about a jack-hammer enema...
,,If that footage is during the race or WUP,, it should take Spies right off of anyone's DOTM list. Who's responsible for such an unsorted/unbalanced/unworthy setup. The Yamaha seem sublime when setup correctly and Spies wins races.
gross oversight incompetence anyone? or something broke?
Grahluk wrote:You would want a rider to fail just because his fans annoy you?
Yep, the Stoner bandwagon is getting to the same point that Rossi's was a while ago - and I have as much problem with that as I do with the Rossi one. In fact, this is just one example of the negative effect I feel Rossi has had on the sport and why I do NOT acept that he has been only good for the sport - but this is not the place to discuss that.Grahluk wrote:On the other coin some of the Stoner fans are also really making it hard to just sit back and appreciate how the guy rides.
chc-pr wrote:On a related note, I wish people would stop assuming that what is good for Rossi/what Rossi supporters want is also good/wanted by everyone interested in MotoGP. It is just more of the same arrogance and it is really annoying.
Faster1 wrote:,,If that footage is during the race or WUP,, it should take Spies right off of anyone's DOTM list. Who's responsible for such an unsorted/unbalanced/unworthy setup. The Yamaha seem sublime when setup correctly and Spies wins races.
gross oversight incompetence anyone? or something broke?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest